The Anthropic Principle Fallacy

Life exists because the conditions of our planet are perfect. The Moon is just the right distance from Earth. The gravitational constant and electric charge on the atom are just right.  Everything is somehow just perfect..

earth moon anthropic principle

The Anthropic Principle is the idea that it is pointless to question why, because life can only exist with these perfect conditions. This is a dismissive and circular logical fallacy. It’s a flaw in reasoning.  Life is much more than a bunch of coincidences. We are more than the mere product of time and chance.

We dismiss the beauty and intelligence of mother nature as a serendipitous ‘big bang’ that arose from nothing for no particular reason.  Consent in manufactured through the acquiescence of the minds that are weak. A nihilistic ontology by way of ‘big bangs’, the media, and propagandized sheep.

“The facts of science are real enough, and so are the techniques that scientists use, and so are the technologies based on them. But the belief system that governs conventional scientific thinking is an act of faith.”  -Rupert Sheldrake

“Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.” -Alejandro Jodorowski

To see whats going on with the Earth and Moon here, enter the mystery

Reality, the Universe, Earth, whatever you want to call it, it is not the product of continual serendipitous coincidences over time that eventually produce our anthropic existence. Everything was created, manifested through love by the Creator, and not some cosmic coincidence.

For far too long, Science, what once was called ‘Natural Philosophy’, has nudged the Divine Architect out in favor of a nihilistic form of reductionistic materialism.

Philo-sophy, The love of knowledge has left us, and in return, a sacrosanct blue-pill of mental servitude.

tri 3

“There is no explanation in the Big Bang theory for the seemingly fortuitous fact that the density of matter has just the right value for the evolution of a benign, life supporting universe.”  

“If the universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in.”

–Robert Jastrow, agnostic astronomer, author of God and the Astronomers

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 532 other subscribers

Leave a Reply

4 Comments on "The Anthropic Principle Fallacy"

What do you think?

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
trackback

[…] The Anthropic Principle Fallacy […]

trackback

[…] of design, not the result of chance. While not directly commenting on what physicists call the Anthropic principle, he has much to say about the particular parameters of our world that refute the common materialist […]

trackback
[…] Plichta became convinced that beneath the surface of physical, chemical and biological phenomena lay a deeper structure, composed of numbers.  Along the way, Plichta comments about many surprising facts that seem to suggest that the world we live in is the product of design, not the result of chance. While not directly commenting on what physicists call the Anthropic principle, he has much to say about the particular parameters of our world that refute the common materialist notion that we are just a speck in the vastness of space. The Earth, which presents the perfect environment for humans, is not… Read more »
trackback

[…] time.  We even coined a name for the uselessness in asking why we exist.  It’s called the Anthropic Principle, a logical fallacy and cop out for intelligent […]

wpDiscuz
%d bloggers like this: