Part VI: The Impossible Flat Earth
creatumejortu.com/tierra-concava-vi-la-imposible-tierra-plana
In 14 Impossibilities
1. There Are Individuals Convinced That The Earth Is Flat
Although it may seem impossible , there are individuals, sharing our same reality, convinced that the Earth is flat, like a crispy pizza with ice edges delimiting the water and the continents... However, why should a flat horizon imply that the entire Earth's surface is flat?: and that is because, as we know from multiple experiments, light does not travel in a straight line over great distances, therefore, the only thing we can truly know is one thing: there is no way we can see the real shape of Heaven and Earth , or to put it the other way around, precisely how we see the Earth with our eyes is certainly not the case, due to the multiple refractions and bending of light over long distances. So we can safely say that the Earth has another shape, different from its apparent one .
In fact, even if the horizon were to appear convex or concave, this in itself would not be definitive proof of the true shape of the Earth and the Sky, since it is easy to confuse the focal limit of sunlight with the physical limit of the Earth , even though the latter extends beyond the focal horizon of light, which we cannot see.
Be that as it may, among the many impossibilities for the flat-earth model to work, I will highlight the 14 that seem decisive to me, each of them being sufficient to destroy it, the model will be destroyed not only 1 but 14 times :
2. The Natural Horizon Of Day And Night
When observing the flat Earth model, the first thing one notices is the incongruity of day and night… If the Sun functioned as a direct source of light on the flat surface of the Earth, the horizon of light would form a circle or ellipse, as one would expect from a focal light, and not a straight line, as they are forced to represent in order to maintain some correspondence with real timetables.
Thus, Day and Night itself refute and exterminate the fanciful model of a flat Earth, which is forced to resort to unknown, exceptional optical effects, due to an unknown dome shape, with various angles and refractions yet to be discovered, and a series of conceptual tricks that only discredit those who use them .
As we can see in this representation, sunlight should take an unnatural shape, in the flat-earth model, to coincide with the time zones we experience.
These intricate shapes would have to take the focus of sunlight throughout the year, in the flat- earth model, in order to coincide with the time zones we experience: impossible
3. The Origin Of Atmospheric Pressure Or 'Gravity'
And where atmospheric pressure (gravity) comes from, so that things stay in place, with a certain weight, as we experience, is something they cannot explain, beyond each person's weight and density (they do not care that this varies according to altitude); but what they do have very clear is that water can never take a spherical shape, and this despite the fact that we see liquids take spherical or droplet shape very easily , due to tensions, frequencies and pressures, totally natural but which, apparently, escape the understanding of flat- earthers.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/uENITui5_jU
Since seawater is a good electrical and diamagnetic conductor, it is very likely that the large bodies of water on Earth are largely affected by atmospheric pressure and the rotational movement of the celestial sphere, which moves and vibrates at all times , from the center of the cosmos to the outside of it (Earth), with a pressure of 0 in the center and maximum (9.8 m/s 2 ) at the edges, and stabilized by countless cavities at the Earth's poles.
Because it is very logical and natural for water to take on a spherical shape: the rotation of the sky itself creates the natural pressure for not only water to take on such a shape, but also all the matter that solidified and stopped when moving away from the center, after being thrown out in the original explosion.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/VhWQ-r1LYXY
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/L3UOix59AtY
Due to the rotation of the Celestial Sphere itself, two magnetic or etheric forces are generated: a flow force (pressure), greater the closer it is to the surface, and another reflux force (levitation), which is weak at the surface and greater the further it is from it. At the center of the Sky, the pressure force is 0 and the levitation force is ∞.
4. The Rotation Of The Stars Of The South Pole
The natural curvature of light allows us to see the stars of the South Pole (the constellation of Octant with Sigma Octantis), even if we are above the equator, and the star of the North Pole (Polaris) even if we are below the Earth's equator: up to 20º above and below the equator.
This is so, according to heliocentrists, thanks to the atmospheric refraction of light; however, light refraction in air reaches a maximum of 1.000293º, which does not enable the vision of the polar stars 20º below the equator, in any case. A true curvature of light is required ; mere atmospheric refraction is not enough, as we can see, to see the polar stars 20º below the equator.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/gJRnbCCuxVU
This physical inconsistency leads many flat-earthers to consider a flat Earth, since the heliocentric model also contains several impossibilities or conundrums ; however, in this case, the natural curvature of light must be taken into account, which allows the polar stars to be seen below the equator, which would be impossible in a heliocentric model.
What is totally impossible, on a flat Earth, is the vision of Sigma Octantis (the closest star to the South Pole) rotating on its axis, because obviously the Southern Cross or the Octant constellation rotates on its axis incessantly, and no matter how much a flat-earther begs, we cannot ignore the rotation of the Octant on its axis, a minimum of seriousness please. So there is no justification whatsoever for this phenomenon and it makes the existence of a flat Earth impossible .
And the North and South polar stars rotate in opposite directions, apparently to the observer, which is evidence of the sphericity of the Earth since, on a flat Earth, without poles, all the stars would be seen to rotate in the same direction , from all points on the Earth: this of course does not happen because the Earth (and the Sky) are spherical.
Logically and naturally, in a heliocentric system, there should be large groups of stars that, due to their translational motion, could not be seen during the winter, at the same coordinates where they would be visible on summer nights. However, this does not happen, and this proves the multiple errors of the heliocentric model, which also does not hold up.
5. The Midnight Antarctic Sun
At the end of December, residents near the South Pole can observe the circular Sun throughout the night, without setting below the horizon . This would be absolutely impossible on a flat Earth, since the Sun would never illuminate the outer diameter of the circle, and in one place or another in the Southern Hemisphere, it would be pitch dark.
However, what the Midnight Sun does demonstrate is the sphericity of the Earth, also at the South Pole, so that during the days close to December 23 the Sun travels across the lower part of the celestial sphere, approaching the South Pole and illuminating its entire area throughout its rotation , without setting even at midnight.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/Uo9rgrCXYHA
Thus, once again, the flat Earth model, this time by the Midnight Sun, is completely destroyed and disabled . We will continue with the list of impossibilities, so that the destruction of this utopian model is definitive and irreversible.
6. The Sunset And Moonset 'Below' The Horizon
In a congruent flat Earth model (without referring to the catch-all of ' holograms ' or 'magic'), the Sun would be visible 24 hours a day , no matter how far it was from our latitude, since the horizon would always be below the Sun, if it were at the height of 4,800 km that the flat Earthers themselves claim.
They allude to perspective, however, no matter how much perspective one wants to take into account, the Sun would have to pass beneath the flat surface of the Earth to create the sunrise and sunset effect we see every day. Again, a logical analysis of our surroundings and the natural laws of physics destroy the impossible flat-Earth model .
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/zjRlEBv1114
The radius of vision of the horizon is determined by the curvature of light, which is greater than the curvature of the Earth, and creates an apparently flat horizon.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/YCwBArEldGY
What really happens when we can see beyond the horizon: another horizon, higher up. The Earth is concave, welcome home.
7. The Flights Of The Airplanes
Regular airline flights, which can be booked and are used by hundreds of people every day, prove beyond doubt the impossibility of a flat Earth: for example, a flight from Johannesburg (South Africa) to Sydney (Australia) takes the same time as a flight of the same distance in the Northern Hemisphere ; however, considering the flat Earth model, the flight across the Southern Hemisphere would have to take much longer, due to the lack of a pole or center of rotation, which would be spread out in an outer ring of exorbitant magnitudes.
The truth is that a flight from one point to another in the Southern Hemisphere takes the same amount of time as a flight across the Northern Hemisphere. This, without a doubt, completely invalidates any possibility of a flat Earth .
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/Ha9FplZ8pnE
According to the coordinates used by companies whose job is to calculate the most efficient routes for airlines, the Earth has a concave curvature.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/gutL7585oqE
The higher the speed, the greater the inclination the plane must travel, upwards with respect to the surface; further evidence that, in its vastness, the Earth is concave.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/NubmZqTH61w
8. Cartography
Because, to emphasize the same argument, real-life physical distances don't fit with the stupid flat-Earth model: a trip from Cape Town to Port Elizabeth, South Africa, takes exactly the time expected according to the spherical Earth model, and would be completely impossible in a flat-Earth model, in which South Africa would have colossal dimensions, and any trip would take much longer than expected in a spherical Earth model. However, this trip in the Southern Hemisphere and the one from Lisbon to Cartagena, for example, in the Northern Hemisphere, are both about 1,000 km and take roughly the same amount of time to complete.
This would occur at all latitudes below the equator, since by not folding back to a South Pole, the dimensions would be stretched out like a pizza, and any trip across the Southern Hemisphere would be far more costly, in terms of time and resources, than it actually is , as we experience every day and as millions of individuals can verify. Therefore, the physical distances themselves, both visible and experimental, demonstrate that the flat Earth model is absolutely impossible and unrealistic .
The flat Earth map or model used is the azimuthal one, which is certainly very interesting, as it shows the entire land mass at once, maintaining sphericity as much as possible with minimal distortion. In this sense, the azimuthal map is truly useful and interesting , for example, in international time calculations, as it allows us to see at a glance the position of the Sun on Earth: thus, it serves as a 24-hour clock. But from there to considering it real and concluding that, in fact, we live on a pizza crust with stratospheric edges...
In fact, in the early days of cartography, maps typically depicted a concave Earth , as was the custom in Europe, China, Arabia, Japan, Russia, and everywhere else where the science flourished. Likewise, the Universe, the Heavens, have always been represented as a sphere , and were thus called the "Celestial Sphere."1 , around which the stars glide, due to the effect of a magnetic gravitation that keeps them in perpetual and majestic movement, perhaps giving off cosmic harmonies that reach the Earth, just as the pressure that keeps us glued to the ground reaches it.
Azimuthal or 24-hour clocks are the real clocks, and should be in common use as well as serving for military use.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/AUSbe_VVpAE
The azimuthal map of the Earth is a concave projection of the Earth, as can be seen in this simulator.
9. Perspective And Celestial Dimensions
If we lived on a pizza-shaped platform, from the Southern Hemisphere, the celestial orbits would appear elliptical , not circular, because even supposing that the sky were a dome or semicircle, the Earth would be a plane and would cause obvious distortions at great distances, such as the view of the star Polaris from any point in the Southern Hemisphere, which in reality does not happen.
And the distortions and aberrations would not only occur in the celestial orbits, but also in the dimensions of the stars, which would be smaller when they are far from our location, and larger when they approach our position ; however, what happens is that the stars are always seen in a very similar dimension, thus proving that both Heaven and Earth are spherical in nature.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/VBx2wssJu5w
What actually happens is that, as light bends due to pressure and refraction (a negative or divergent meniscus), we see the sky unfolded, not as it really is. We must fold the sky back to understand its true nature.
The fact that light propagates by means of refractions in negative meniscus (in divergent rays) demonstrates by itself the concavity of the Earth.
10. The Speeds Of The Stars
Consequently, not only would the celestial orbits appear elliptical, or would the stars appear to be of different magnitude (depending on whether they were far or close to our latitude), but they would also move at different speeds : the speed would be greater the closer they were to our latitude, and the speed would be lower the further the star was from our position on Earth.
However, this is not the case at all, since both Heaven and Earth are almost perfect spheres, and the speed of the stars always remains constant in their rotation . This curious phenomenon invalidates not only the flat-earth model, but also heliocentrism, since, if we
properly conceive the translational movement, which must be added to the rotational movement of the Earth, we will see how, under similar conditions and from our perspective, the stars and the Moon itself would accelerate and slow down their progress , depending on whether they were closer or further from the Earth, and we would even see groups of stars moving, some towards the North, others towards the East, and the stars themselves would move in all directions.
This does not happen, but rather all groups of stars are nailed to the sky, and maintain their motionless orbits over the millennia : proof that Heaven is a rotating sphere smaller than the Earth which, still and motionless, contains and protects it.
11. The Sphericity Of The Sky And The Stars
Because in nature everything tends to take a spherical shape ... from a cell to the stars that orbit the sky. We see it in water drops, whose surface takes on the most appropriate tension, the spherical one, since "the spherical figure is the most apt for movement" (DemAbd.fr. 597), in soap bubbles, in eggs, in the eyes and heads of living beings, ovaries, seeds, fruits, the Sun, the Moon... however, for some strange reason, the Earth was formed capriciously, with the mass extended towards the edges, like a plate lest the water spill over.
On second thought, the most logical and natural thing would be for the primordial explosion to generate a shock wave, releasing all the primordial matter equally in all directions . This release of energy would slow down, cool down and solidify as it moved away from the origin of the deflagration: this process of moving away and cooling would give rise to a spherical, motionless Earth, located at the edges of the cosmos, while the matter close to the origin of the initial 'big bang' (Heaven), by the effect of its own nature, would remain rotating indefinitely , or until it collapsed or regressed to the point of origin.
Thus, a flat Earth would represent a natural anomaly , something bizarre that would require bizarre explanations to justify its existence; whereas a sphere is the most common form in nature, both on Earth and in Heaven.
The original explosion threw all the newly created matter outward from atom to atom and in all directions equally, so that the matter closest to the explosion would continue its movement, giving rise to the Sun, the Moon, and the Celestial Sphere, while the matter further away would cool, solidify, and cease its circular motion, giving rise to the sphere of the Earth, which is the very limit of the cosmos.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/iJg3b89TE_g
12. The Moon Phases
Obviously, different lunar phases would be visible from different points on Earth , so there would never be the same lunar phase visible to everyone, as is the case every day in our lives. So, to ignore this phenomenon and accept the flat Earth model, I wonder how far one would have to turn one's face away from reality, and hold it turned away in such a chilling way...
Naturally, the lunar phases would be different depending on where we were, which does not happen and we always see the same lunar phase, no matter from what point on Earth it is observed.
In the concave Earth model, the only one without impossibilities , the lunar phases are perfectly explained, since the Moon receives the light of the Sun once it curves after polarizing on the Earth's surface; due to the enormity of the Earth, and of space and the resistance it exerts as pressure increases, sunlight bends upwards, equally in all directions , and bends more than the gigantic concave surface of the Earth; this causes various horizons, although maximum visibility is limited by the beam of the most open or outer curvature. As the light folds back at the point opposite the Sun, symmetrically, it will create large areas of antisolar illumination, so that the Moon will be illuminated by that blanket of cold, dim, polarized light, and will be more illuminated at the antisolar point (full moon) and less at the solar point (New Moon), as is logical and natural, because it is in transit close to the Sun.2 .
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/3hPCLfo_WnI
In fact, one thing is certain: light does not follow a perfectly straight path... during its transit to the Earth's surface, due to the effect of increasing atmospheric pressure, added to the negative meniscus (divergent) refractions suffered when passing through the celestial glass spheres, a first curvature of the light is produced, which when it hits the Earth's surface at a glance becomes polarized and folds back towards the antisolar point, symmetrically, due to the effect of the same rotation of the sky and the refractions, this time returning towards the center of the universe, with much less power, and in positive meniscus (convergent).
On the other hand, we must understand what it means for the Moon to always show the same face, while they say it maintains a rotational movement on its axis and a translational movement with respect to the Earth, and all of this in step with the Earth's own rotation
and translation , without the face of the Moon barely changing during its spatial transit, and without varying its speed despite the various movements in action... can you imagine it?
And not only that, to all this tangle of movements synchronized by miraculous chance we must add the minuscule probability that the Sun, being at an astronomical distance, and the Moon, located close to the Earth, maintain almost the same apparent dimension seen from the Earth's surface, and share the same ecliptic plane, the same direction and a similar trajectory (coinciding also several times a year with eclipses). Miracle upon miracle upon miracle. Let's be clear: heliocentrists demand an exorbitant leap of faith , and like flat- earthers, they need to resort to all kinds of exceptions, coincidences and pretenses to force natural phenomena to fit their erroneous theoretical model.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/M_nV_NSrSDI
13. Lunar Eclipses
And the fact is that lunar eclipses are not satisfactorily explained by either the flat-Earth model or the heliocentric model... In the flat-Earth model, they need to allude to holograms, extradimensional projections, anomalous reflections, etc... without presenting any explanation that respects nature or logic. Lunar eclipses destroy the flat-Earth model , which is incapable of resolving either partial lunar eclipses or total eclipses or 'Blood Moons'.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/3IRj7fxJ1o4
According to the heliocentric model, lunar eclipses occur due to the passage of the Moon behind the Earth, which casts its shadow on the Moon with a reddish hue, leaving the Moon thus eclipsed for a brief time, visible to millions of inhabitants at certain latitudes, depending on the time of the eclipse. Well, it is known by the laws of nature that red light is the spectrum of light that bends the least of all, so that, in the heliocentric model, the light that would fall on the lunar surface would be the one that bends the most, and in no case the least, so that it would never produce this reddish effect on the days of a total lunar eclipse.3 , but the tint of the Moon would be more violet or blue.
As the diagram shows, the spectrum of light falling on the moon would be the most refracted; however, the spectrum of "red" light is the least refracted, with the reddish tint visible during the "penumbra" and the violet during the "umbra." This is one of the many inconsistencies that also invalidate the heliocentric model.
Only the concave Earth model gives a logical and natural explanation for this reddish tint of the Moon: as it passes right through the antisolar point, the Moon is eclipsed (ἐκλεῖψις), that is, the beam of light stands out (ἐκ-λείπω), hiding its rays, except for the red light spectrum, which is bent less , and tints the face of the Moon red during its brief transit through the antisolar point. Of the three models considered, the concave Earth model is the only one that offers a congruent answer to lunar eclipses.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/KY39Yi6DxQc
14. The Sideral Phenomenon 'Gegenschein'
The strange phenomenon called ' Gegenschein ' also has no satisfactory explanation, neither the flat Earth model nor heliocentrism can explain it... According to the latter, it would be a 'fortuitous' conjunction of star dust , and they do not give it much importance; however, this point of light is the keystone to destroy the flat Earth model and heliocentrism at the same time .
The only model that logically and naturally explains this incredible phenomenon is, once again, the concave Earth model, according to which sunlight bends after hitting the Earth's surface, folding back towards the antisolar point.4. Well, the antisolar point, where the light beams converge, is the so-called 'Gegenschein', whichalways coincides with the point in the night sky opposite theSun.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/gnZQzIJOm8A
Conclusion
In short, there are too many impossibilities, from a natural and logical point of view, that lead us to completely dismiss the possibility of a flat Earth. However, where flat-earthers are right is in their criticism of the heliocentric model , which also harbors several impossibilities that, after careful study, lead us to dismiss this cosmological theory.
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/6yfWx9HVnvU
And the only model without impossibilities, whose explanations follow nature and logic, without altering any visible or experimental phenomenon, is the concave Earth model, which shines immaculately when contrasted with the other two imperfect models. So we must conclude that the Earth is concave: welcome home .
Watch Video At: https://youtu.be/eiH_zZE447U
Part 1: https://creatumejortu.com/la-tierra-es-concava-el-rectilineador
Part 2: https://creatumejortu.com/la-tierra-es-concava-ii-las-plomadas-de-las-minas-tamarack
Part 3: https://creatumejortu.com/la-tierra-es-concava-iii-la-tierra-no-se-mueve
Part 4: https://creatumejortu.com/airys-failure-el-fallo-de-airy
Part 5: https://creatumejortu.com/tierra-concava-v-la-luz-se-curva